Archive

Daily Archives: 21/01/2011

(Eurasia Lift) Russia’s RuLeaks.net website was blocked on Wednesday following publication of photos of Prime Minister Vladimir Putin’s alleged $1 billion an Italian-style palace on the Black Sea coast. PHOTOS

A Washington Post quoted a Russian whistleblower named Sergei Kolesnikov as saying the palace was predominantly paid for with money donated by Russian businessmen for Putin’s use. The funds have come “mainly through a combination of corruption, bribery and theft,” charged Kolesnikov, a businessman who until November 2009 worked for one of the companies he alleges was investing money for Putin.
A Putin spokesman later dismissed the report, saying the building in question had nothing to do with Putin.
NEWS from Spiegel in German

On January 14, the Piracy Party announced the creation of “Russian WikiLeaks” and invited users to send in documents related to corruption, concealment of crime and other socially critical information.
The site’s founders said they had taken precautions about the RuLeaks.net security. Its servers are based outside Russia, the domain name is registered to a foreign national and all information posted on the site is duplicated in real time on special pages in social networks.

Source:
http://eurasialift.wordpress.com/2011/01/19/ruleaks-net-wikileaks-russia-website-blocked-over-putin-palace-pix/

Advertisements

(Jews for Justice for Palestinians)
Tutu’s life has been lived in the spirit of “never again” – the ultimate lesson of the Holocaust

Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu has publicly criticised Israeli policy towards Palestinians living in Gaza and the West Bank. He has also criticised Palestinian attacks on Israeli civilians. These criticisms are well-known.

Recently, his criticisms of Israeli policy have elicited bitter personal attacks. Amidst calls for him to be removed as Patron of the Cape Town and Johannesburg Holocaust Centres of the South African Holocaust Foundation, Tutu has been attacked and labelled an  “anti-Semite” and a “bigot”.

Disagreements should be debated openly, but these personal attacks are totally unacceptable.
Read more…